🎅🎄🦌⛄Wishing you a very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. During the Christmas period, the office will be closed from 25th – 30th December and on January 1st. ⛄🦌🎄🎅

A new era for Worker’s Rights:

Understanding the Employment Rights Bill

The UK government has introduced what it calls the biggest upgrade to employment rights in a generation. The Employment Rights Bill, unveiled in October 2024, promises sweeping changes that will fundamentally reshape the relationship between employers and employees across the country. The main focus points are as follows:-

Protection from Day One

Perhaps the most significant change for workers is the removal of the two-year qualifying period for unfair dismissal claims. Under the new legislation, it is proposed that employees will have the right to challenge unfair dismissal from their very first day at work. While employers will still be able to use a statutory probation period to assess new hires, this change marks a substantial shift in the balance of power, particularly for those in precarious employment situations.

The bill also tackles the controversial practice of ‘fire and rehire,’ where employers dismiss staff and rehire them on worse terms. These dismissals will be considered automatically unfair unless businesses can demonstrate they genuinely had no alternative.

An End to Exploitative Zero-Hours Contracts

For the millions of workers on zero-hours contracts, relief is on the horizon. The bill introduces rights to guaranteed hours based on regular working patterns, reasonable notice of shift changes, and crucially, payments when shifts are cancelled at short notice. These measures aim to provide a baseline of security for workers who have long faced one-sided flexibility that benefits only employers.

Strengthened Sick Pay and Family Leave

The reforms to Statutory Sick Pay remove both the lower earnings limit and the waiting period, meaning workers will receive sick pay from day one regardless of their salary level. This change will particularly benefit lower-paid workers who have historically been excluded from statutory sick pay protection.

Family-friendly provisions receive a significant boost too. Paternity leave and unpaid parental leave will become day-one rights, while new mothers will enjoy enhanced protection against dismissal for six months after returning to work. A new right to unpaid bereavement leave acknowledges the need for time to grieve without fear of losing one’s job.

Better Flexible Working and Harassment Protections

The existing right to request flexible working, already a day-one entitlement, will be strengthened. Employers will need to provide clear explanations when rejecting requests and ensure their decisions are reasonable rather than arbitrary.

On workplace safety, employers will be required to take ‘all reasonable steps’ to prevent sexual harassment and will be held accountable for harassment by third parties such as customers or clients. These measures reflect growing recognition that workplace culture must change.

Easier Access to Justice

Workers will have twice as long to bring employment tribunal claims, with the deadline extending from three to six months. A new Fair Work Agency will consolidate enforcement of various employment rights and will have the power to bring cases on behalf of workers, potentially removing the financial and emotional burden many face when challenging their employers.

The Road Ahead

Most of these reforms are not expected to take effect until 2026 at the earliest, with consultations ongoing to finalise the details. The government insists it has worked closely with both businesses and trade unions to develop measures that are both pro-worker and pro-business.

For employees, these changes represent the most comprehensive upgrade to workplace rights in decades. From greater job security to better work-life balance and stronger protections against exploitation, the Employment Rights Bill promises to deliver meaningful improvements to working life for millions across the UK.

The question now is not whether these changes will happen, but how effectively they will be implemented and enforced. For workers who have long called for greater protection and dignity at work, this legislation offers genuine hope for a fairer future.

If you would like support in navigating these changes, please contact Nina Francis on 020 3831 2664 or email enquiries@wellerslawgroup.com

IR35 – Are you at risk?

Are you concerned about the new IR35 rules and how they may affect your business or subject to an HMRC investigation? Tara Edwards explains what you need to look out for.

The extended off-payroll workers rules now often referred to as the new IR35 rules came into effect on 6th April 2021. They are intended to reduce the number of off-payroll workers (‘contractors’) who treat themselves as being self-employed by taxing them as employees. 

This is achieved by placing responsibility for determining the employment status of the contractor with the organisation receiving the contractor’s services. If your organisation receives services from individuals who are not on your payroll and who work through an intermediary then the new IR35 rules may apply.

Who do the Rules Apply to?

The new IR35 rules apply to organisations which are in the private sector, medium or large in size and connected to the UK.

A company (or an LLP) is small if it satisfies two or more of the following requirements:

  • It’s annual turnover is not more than ÂŁ10.2m;
  • It’s balance sheet total is not more than ÂŁ5.1m;
  • It has no more than 50 employees.

For a group company to be a small company the small business test must be applied to the group as a whole.  There are rules to aggregate the turnover of connected persons, so for complex structures external advice may be needed to confirm the position.

An organisation will have a UK connection if immediately before the beginning of the relevant tax year the entity is either UK tax resident or has a permanent establishment in the UK.

Only contractors who are either resident in the UK or perform their services in the UK can be caught by the new IR35 rules.  The jurisdiction of the contractor’s intermediary company is not a relevant factor.  The IR35 rules are targeted at working arrangements which involve intermediaries acting as the contractor’s personal entity.

Personal Service Companies

Personal service companies are the most common intermediary through which businesses engage with contractors. A contractor would only be caught by the new IR35 legislation if he or she owns the material interest in the personal services company.

Material interest

Material interest is defined as beneficial ownership of or the ability to control more than 5% of the ordinary share capital of the company;

  • An entitlement to receive more than 5% of any distributions that may be made by the company; or
  • An entitlement to receive more than 5% of the assets on winding up.

This can cause problems in that it is often difficult to independently identify corporate ownership structures.

Companies House can confirm whether an individual owns over 50% in the corporate entity.  It will not however identify ownership between 5% and 50% of the intermediary. It will also not identify whether the contractor is entitled to distributions or assets on winding up. It is therefore essential that the engager of the contractor’s services request detailed information and evidence of ownership structure, often coupled with contractual indemnities. The new rules apply if the intermediary is a company in which the contractor (or his associates or together with his associates) have a material interest.  A material interest is a 5% ordinary shareholding in the company.

A second type of intermediary company caught under the rules is a company from which the contractor has received (or has the right to receive) a ‘chain payment’.  A chain payment is the amount paid for the services which the contractor has provided to the client.  The legislation makes it clear that where PAYE is already applied to a contractor’s earnings the new IR35 rules will not apply.

The new IR35 rules do not apply where the agency employs the contractor and operates PAYE on earnings paid to the contractor.  However if the agency contracts with the contractor’s intermediary, ie personal service company, rather than with the contractor directly then the new IR35 rules can still apply.

The new IR35 rules apply where a contractor personally performs (or is under an obligation personally to perform) services for an engager.  Where your organisation contracts with a service provider for a fully outsourced service typically it is not entering into a contract for the supply of a particular contractor.  Your organisation is not therefore the ‘client’ for the purposes of the new IR35 rules.  In an outsourced arrangement the service provider is the client and it is therefore the service provider that must apply the new IR35 rules.  Advice should be taken on whether this is an outsourced service.

If the contractor and personal service company fall within the scope of the rules then you must examine whether the contractor would have been an employee or your organisation had it not been for the existence of the intermediary.  This is known as a ‘status determination’.  If it is decided that the contractor would have been an employee they are referred to as being ‘deemed employed’ by the client.

Who’s responsibility is it to determine employment status of contractor?

It is up to the engager to determine whether the IR35 legislation applies.  HMRC will seek underpaid Income Tax and NIC from the engaging entity.  Engagers must ensure that where they are relying on the representations made by contractors that they have processes in place to validate the information provided, requesting detailed back up documentation from the contractor and checking the data as much as possible against Companies House.

The obligation to determine the contractor’s employment status and the preparation of the status determination statement falls on the engager of the services of a contractor.  If these obligations are not complied with the engager becomes liable for any underpaid Income Tax and NIC as well as interest and penalties.

Determining who the engager is may have its own complexities where there are multiple agencies and outsourced services. Where the outsourced service primarily relates to the provision of specific individuals (possibly naming them) there is a risk that it may not be an outsourced service.

Careful consideration of mixed service contracts and bespoke payment agency arrangements, for example where it is commission based, should be carefully analysed.  The engager when analysing these arrangements needs to consider whether the contractor’s services are similar to those of employees.  If this is the case then this may not be an outsourced service. HMRC have given guidance on this point stating that where the service provided by the worker sits squarely with the nature of the business this indicates this is not an outsourced service. It is essential that businesses and their suppliers agree where the responsibility lies for undertaking employment status assessments.

Engagements with small companies fall outside the scope of the new IR35 rules

All decisions and their rationale should be documented in case of HMRC enquiry. Periodic reviews should be undertaken since arrangements may change over time.   Procedures need to be put in place to ensure this occurs.  Contracts should be revisited to ensure they reflect the true nature of the engagements.

It is clear that a determination by the engager that a contractor is employed under the IR35 legislation will not be welcomed by the contractor because their remuneration would be subject to Income Tax and NIC deductions.

Contractors have historically challenged their employment status determinations, completing HMRC’s check of employment status tool, leading to dispute resolution.  The new legislation states that the engager is required to consider these challenges within 45 days of receipt and to provide a statement either confirming the original decision with supporting reasons or to amend the original decision, unless there was a corresponding day rate increase.  They would leave.

VAT and Contractors’ Invoices

Regardless whether the contractor’s invoice is subject to a further payment of PAYE and NIC, the VAT element is still payable to HMRC. Procedures need to be in place to identify these invoices so that only the amount due to the contractor under the IR35 rules is paid and the VAT element processed through the ultimate engager’s VAT Return.

Employment Rights

These changes do not entitle the contractors to employment rights.  This has been specifically stated by the Government.  However, since the contractor will be treated as an employee there is a risk that they will request holiday pay, sick pay and other employment benefits.

Conclusions

Engagers should review whether their contractors come within IR35 and a procedure set up for deadlines for the acceptance of new engagement terms.  It will be necessary to review all supply chains to ascertain whether those suppliers use contractors. 

Due diligence of supply chains because of the transfer of liability provisions within the new legislation.  Underpaid Income Tax and NIC can transfer to the first agency in the contractual chain but if not collected by them to the end engager itself.  Contracts need to be reviewed to ensure there are adequate indemnities and obviously the liquidity of the agency ascertained.

Umbrella companies have been used as a substitute for personal service companies to eradicate the need of undertaking employment status assessments, however, contractors may not agree to do so and the engager’s costs could escalate.

There are however further risks if the umbrella company is not registered in the UK.  HMRC is focusing on non-compliant umbrella companies and so there is still a risk that the Income Tax and NIC could pass to the ultimate engager.

To determine the status of the contracts the ‘on the ground’ working arrangements between the parties must be analysed.  Where an agency is involved this will entail understanding the terms of the contract between the agency and the contractor’s intermediary. If the contractor is an office holder of the client organisation they will automatically be a ‘deemed employee’.

The new IR35 rules put an obligation on the client to provide a status determination statement to the contractor and to the intermediary (eg the recruitment agency).  If the client fails to do so and the contractor is working through an intermediary the client will automatically be treated as the ‘deemed employer’ and will be obliged to account for PAYE.

There is no prescribed format for the status determination statement.  If the CEST test has been used HMRC will accept the results of the test. The client must take ‘reasonable care’ in the making of the status determination otherwise they will automatically be treated as the ‘deemed employer’. The status determination statement must be issued before the payments on or after 6 April 2021 are made. The statement can be appealed in writing or orally.

Where there is a chain of entities between the client organisation and the contractor’s intermediary, it will usually be the entity that pays the intermediary (rather than the client) that will be the ‘deemed employer’ and responsible for the payment of tax.

PAYE must be deducted from the amount of the payment made by the ‘deemed employer’.  This will usually be a fee invoice by the intermediary, net of VAT.  The ‘deemed employer’ may also, if it chooses, deduct expenses that would be tax free if paid to an employee such as free subsidised meals provided on their premises.

It may be possible to terminate existing contracts with contractors and enter new contracts with a reduced fee to reflect the fact that the client organisation will now assume responsibility for employer’s NIC. Alternatively the contractor may be willing to abandon their intermediary entity and provide the services to the client via an umbrella company or agency. 

A third option would be for the client organisation to offer the contractor a fixed term contract of employment. This publication is a general summary of the law.  It should not replace legal advice tailored to your specific circumstances. If you would like to discuss your tax situation please call us on 020 7481 2422 or you can email enquiries@wellerslawgroup.com.

Employment Law Changes with the new Labour Government

After 14 years of a Conservative government, Labour have now taken up residence in Downing Street. Alongside the change in residence, the Labour party’s manifesto outlines several changes that employers need to be aware of, it they are enacted, subject to consultation. These key reforms are set to be introduced within 100 days and span from discrimination law and “Day One Rights” to trade unions and industrial action.

 

Day One Employment Rights – Key Changes:

  1. Unfair dismissal, sick pay and parental leave

Currently, an employee must accrue two years of continuous service to a company before they can claim unfair dismissal in an employment tribunal.

Labour’s reform will grant protection of unfair dismissal as well as sick pay and parental leave which will be deemed “Day One Rights”

 

  1. Fair Pay

National minimum wage (NMW) rates are presently based on average earnings.

With Labour’s manifesto, existing age bands (allowing payment of a reduced rate) will be scrapped in favour of a flat rate for all age groups.

“Fair Pay Agreements” will be introduced, under which pay rates are determined by sectoral collective bargaining. It is likely that this will be trialled out in the social care sector before this is rolled out to other sectors due to a lack of support in the business community.

 

  1. Discrimination Law

Currently, equal pay legislation applies to gender pay disparities to cover disabled and BAME employees. Gender Pay Gap Reporting has been mandatory since 2017.

Key changes in this area will include:

  • Implementation of Ethnicity Pay Gap Reporting (for employers with 250+ employees).
  • Implementation of Disability Pay Gap Reporting (for employers with 250+ employees).
  • Gender Pay Gap Reporting action plans are to be published and are to include outsourced workers. This means that pay gap reporting will be a far larger exercise than it has been historically.
  • Sexual harassment will be treated and have similar protections to whistleblowing
  • There will be enhanced protection of sexual harassment for interns
  • A ban on dismissing returning maternity leavers will be introduced, covering six months after the return to work except in specific circumstances.

 

  1. Enforcement

Labour is set to introduce extensions of time limits for tribunal claims from three months to six months. This is due to delays in the current tribunal system.

Labour are proposing to establish a new state body “Fair Work Agency” with the power to inspect workplaces and take legal action where necessary. This will mean documentation and record keeping will become more significant going forward.

 

  1. Ending “one-sided” flexibility

Labour are planning to implement a ban on “fire and rehire”. Further movement is expected in this area as Labour openly criticised the recently released Tory statutory Code of Practice as being “inadequate”.

Additionally, zero hour contracts will be banned and there will be a shift in narrative on empowering employees to request contracts that reflect the hours of work undertaken.

 

  1. Trade Unions and Industrial Action

Labour will be working to simplify trade union recognition and improve trade union worker access to workplaces. Further, self-employed workers are to enjoy the same improvements to trade union rights as workers.

 

  1. Worker Status & Self-Employment

Labour aim to (eventually) abolish:

  • The U.K.’s three tier system for employment status
  • The distinction between employees and workers – this will need further consultation on the logistics of sick pay, family leave and other policies in these models.

Rights for self-employed people will be written in a contract and will enable self-employed workers to take action on late payments, extend health and safety blacklisting protections to the self-employed. Further clarity and consultation is needed in this area.

 

If you have any enquiries relating to these potential changes, please get in touch with Nina Francis by email nina.francis@wellerslawgroup.com or by phone on 020 3831 2664.

What are the valid reasons for terminating employment?

We often find that employers can feel that it is almost impossible to dismiss an employee.

Whilst we would advise that employers always seek advice before terminating an employee’s employment (or starting any process towards this), with the right advice and guidance, this can be a straight forward process.

 The Law

By law, to lawfully dismiss an employee with more than 2 years’ service, you must show that you have a valid reason that you can justify and that you acted reasonably in all the circumstances.

Fair reasons for dismissal

Under section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (the 1996 Act) there are various valid reasons for terminating employment. These include:

  • Redundancy
  • Conduct
  • Capability
  • Breach of a statutory restriction
  • For some other substantial reason

Dismissal due to redundancy

In this changing economic climate, many companies have had to restructure themselves to keep their competitive edge, to improve or simply to survive.

In short, redundancy occurs when an employer needs to reduce the size of the workforce. There are many reasons why this might be the case, including:

  • The introduction of new technology that makes certain jobs unnecessary
  • The job a person was hired to do no longer exists
  • The business is closing down or a change in location
  • There is a need to cut costs and staff numbers might therefore be reduced

Redundancy as a form of dismissal can be considered fair as long as there is a genuine reason for the redundancy, a lawful process has been followed and a fair selection criteria has been applied.

Our specialist employment team can help guide you through any potential redundancy process to seek to ensure that you follow the processes which you are required to, so as to minimise potential liabilities and follow best practice.

Termination due to misconduct 

Misconduct issues could include things like persistent lateness or unauthorised absences from work, while performance issues could include an inability to keep up with important changes to their job or to get along with work colleagues.
That said, unless any misconduct or performance issues are especially serious, you will need to give an employee the opportunity to change their behaviour or the chance to improve their performance prior to making any decision to dismiss. You may also need to provide suitable training.

In some cases, however, the misconduct may be so serious so as to justify summary dismissal. This is known as gross misconduct, where terminating employment without notice, or pay in lieu of notice, can be lawful, as long as you follow a fair process and there is clear evidence to support your finding.

Termination due to capability

You can lawfully dismiss an employee if they are incapable of doing their job to the required standard or they are capable but unwilling to do their job properly.

Capability dismissal should follow prior reasonable attempts by the employer to understand, manage and improve employee capability issues.

Performance reviews and discussions with employees should be ongoing. When performance is monitored and reviewed regularly, there are more opportunities for feedback and for identifying and resolving problems. The goal should be to establish why the employee’s performance is lacking, provide support and then work towards a legally compliant dismissal if necessary.

Throughout the capability management procedure, it will be crucial to have evidence to demonstrate how the employee is falling short of the standards required and as proof of performance management measures taken by the employer.

Illness will also fall under this sub-heading

It is possible to fairly dismiss an employee by reason of a longstanding illness or prolonged absence through sickness where this has affected their ability to do their job or has made it impossible for them to do their job at all.

However, where a capability issue is linked to someone’s long-term disability of physical or mental health, dismissal should be used as a last resort after exploring ways in which you can help the employee to do their job. This could include arranging an occupational health assessment to determine what, if any, reasonable adjustments can be made to assist them, such as a phased return to work, amended duties, altered hours or workplace adaptations.

Dismissal due to a breach of a statutory restriction

This reason is rarely used when terminating employment but can be necessary where continuing to employ someone would mean that you are breaking the law.

Examples of statutory restriction dismissals could include:

  • If an employee’s immigration status prevents them from working, such as their work visa expiring, it would be illegal to carry on employing them.
  • If an employee is required to drive as a substantial part of their role and has lost their licence, and there is no alternative work they can do
  • If someone fails to earn or maintain a qualification that is required for them to perform their job.

If you suspect or become aware of a change in an employee’s working status, you should arrange an initial discussion with them to discuss their situation. The employment contract should include provision for dismissal without notice if the employee is found to have lost the right to work, as this would constitute a breach of contract.

Termination due to some other substantial reason (SOSR)

The concept of “some other substantial reason” (SOSR) is a statutory catch-all provision that allows an employer to fairly dismiss an employee in circumstances where no other potentially fair reasons apply.

The SOSR depends on the facts and circumstances of each case and there is no helpful statutory definition of the term ‘substantial’, but it cannot be anything frivolous or insignificant.

Case law has provided some examples where the courts have found that an employee was fairly dismissed for SOSR. These include:

  • Third party pressure;
  • The employee refuses to accept new terms of employment;
  • Personality clash between two or more employees;
  • Conflict of interest;
  • Expiry of a fixed term contract;
  • Reputational risk; and
  • Business reorganisation that doesn’t fall under the statutory definition of redundancy.

Employers must also act reasonably and follow an appropriate procedure before dismissing the employee. Alternatives to dismissal, such as moving the employee to a different location or department, should always be considered before moving to dismissal. However, whether this can be achieved tends to pivot on the resources and size of the organisation in question.

If you have any issues with regard to termination of employment please contact Nina Francis on 0203 831 2664 or email Nina on nina.francis@wellerslawgroup.com

 

If you would like to receive our newsletter please let us know here