πŸŽ…πŸŽ„πŸ¦Œβ›„Wishing you a very Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. During the Christmas period, the office will be closed from 25th – 30th December and on January 1st. β›„πŸ¦ŒπŸŽ„πŸŽ…

Choosing the Right Trust

How different types of trusts work?

There are a number of different types of trusts.  Given the regularity with which I am asked what type of trust is best for a given situation I have provided a brief definition of some of the key types, setting out their advantages and disadvantages and briefly referring to their tax treatment. 

Bare Trust

This is the simplest form of trust.  It consists of one or more trustees and one or more beneficiaries. Some have described it as a half-way house between a full trust and outright ownership. 

The beneficiary has an immediate and absolute right to both the capital and income of the trust at 18 years of age provided they have sufficient mental capacity. 

The assets of the trust are held in the name of the trustee or trustees but the trustee has no discretion over the assets held in trust.  The trustee of the bare trust is a mere nominee in whose name the property is held.  Except in the case of bare trusts for minors, the trustee has no active duties to perform.  The trustee must simply follow the instructions of the beneficiary provided they are lawful, in relation to the assets held in trust.   A bare trust can be express or implied by conduct. 

There can be more than one beneficiary provided each beneficiary is absolutely entitled to their share of the trust’s assets.  The trustee has no discretion to change the shares or to use the income from one beneficiary’s share to benefit another beneficiary.

It is straightforward to administer which keeps running costs down and  there is no limit on the number or amount of assets held by the trust and it can hold any kind of asset.

Advantages

Bare trusts are useful vehicles to pay for school fees since the amount can be estimated in advance and only that amount put into the trust.  Often this is a vehicle used by grandparents to pay for grandchildren’s school fees, since once gifted into the trust the sum falls outside of the grandparent’s estate after seven years and they are not taxed on the income of the trust, which parents would be if they had settled the money into a bare trust. 

Disadvantages

The lack of control for the trustees.  They do not have a discretion.  The beneficiary is entitled to take control of the trust fund as soon as they reach 18 years of age and to demand that the assets are put in their names, provided they have mental capacity. The age that the beneficiary becomes entitled to the trust assets is always 18 years of age and this cannot be altered.  The assets in the trust are not ring fenced against creditors of the beneficiary and on the death of the beneficiary will form part of their estate for Inheritance Tax purposes.  

The bare trust is a rigid structure.  Once established the beneficiaries and their share of the trust assets cannot be changed.  No future beneficiaries can be added as the trust has been set up absolutely for the named beneficiaries and this cannot be reversed. A gift to the bare trust is irrevocable and therefore cannot be undone once executed.

It is not a recommended vehicle for large sums of money since the beneficiary will have full access at 18 years of age.

Taxation of bare trust

Income Tax

Except where a parent has settled money into bare trust for a minor, the income received by a bare trust is taxed at the beneficiaries’ marginal rate of tax.  It is treated as if the beneficiary had received it directly themselves. 

If parents have set the trust up, then any trust income over Β£100 is taxed at the parents’ marginal tax rate as if they had received the income.  This would not be the case for grandparents, as explained above.

Capital Gains Tax

A gift into a bare trust would be a deemed disposal for Capital Gains Tax purposes and to the extent that the then market value exceeded the original acquisition cost and any enhancement expenditure, Capital Gains Tax would be charged on the notional gain on the beneficiary. 

Just as above, gains realised by the trustees are treated as if they were realised by the beneficiary and it is the beneficiary’s annual exempt amount that would be available to offset any gains.  

Inheritance Tax

The assets of the bare trust are in the beneficiaries’ estate and will be subject to Inheritance Tax on their death.  Just as with any other gift, if you make a gift into a bare trust you need to survive 7 years for the value of that gift to fall outside of your estate for Inheritance Tax purposes. This is the case where the beneficiary is not also the settlor of the trust funds into trust (i.e. the person gifting the money into the trust). The rules are different for settlor interested trusts    

Discretionary trust

The definition of a discretionary trust is one where none of the beneficiaries has a present right to present enjoyment of the income generated by the trust property.  The trustees have a discretion as to how to apply the trust capital and the income of the trust as it becomes available.  The trust will contain a definition of the class of beneficiaries on whose behalf the trustees hold the trust property but it is up to the trustees to decide how much is paid, how often payments are made and to whom.

As no individual beneficiary can claim the income or capital as of right, such a beneficiary has a mere hope (to be distinguished from a right) that the trustees will at some time exercise their discretion in his or her favour. 

The right of the beneficiary under a discretionary trust, subject to the terms of the trust, is to be considered by the trustees in the exercise of their discretion whether to appoint income or capital and, indeed how much.

Advantages

Discretionary trusts are useful if the settlor is unsure about which of the beneficiaries will need help in the future and in what proportions.  They are also useful as asset protection vehicles because none of the beneficiaries have an enforceable right to the assets of the trust, nor do their creditors. 

Discretionary trusts are useful in estate planning to benefit members of the family in the event of an unexpected death. Property within the trust is exempt from creditors.  A creditor cannot take trust property in bankruptcy or liquidation (unless the debt was originally a trust debt). An exception to this will be where a settlor gifts assets into trust to prevent known creditors accessing funds. In these circumstances if it is established that the act of settlement was done to defraud creditors, the trust can be set aside via litigation.

This type of trust, if properly managed, can be a very tax efficient structure.  There is freedom to implement tax planning after the trust has been set up in response to the changing circumstances of the beneficiaries.

Discretionary trusts allow the settlor of the trust funds to outline how they wish the trust fund to be used, during their lives and thereafter.  The settlor’s wishes are not legally binding, but are useful guidance to the trustees.  If professional trustees are used, the settlor may have the peace of mind that their wishes will be complied with, since there would be no conflict of interest, as there may be between a trustee who is also a beneficiary. 

In terms of flexibility, the trustees can respond to changing family circumstances easily due to the control they have over the use and distribution of assets held by the trust because of the discretion they are given under the terms of the trust. 

Disadvantages

This trust is more costly to administer.  The services of accountants and lawyers may be required to submit trust tax returns and for trust documentation to be drafted.  For example, for every distribution to beneficiaries there must be Deeds of Appointment drafted.

Only profits, not losses are distributed to beneficiaries. 

Taxation

The funds fall fully outside of the settlor’s estate after seven years.  The funds within the trust fund fall within the relevant property regime.  In broad terms, β€˜relevant property’ is property that is not comprised in the estate of the settlor or a beneficiary.  In order to ensure that such assets are not therefore outside the scope of Inheritance Tax, relevant property is subject to exit and principal charges.  These principal charges fall due on the tenth anniversary of the creation of the trust.  The assets within the trust are revalued and a tax charge of 6% of the excess in value above the then nil rate band is charged to Inheritance Tax and paid at that point.  In simple terms, this is repeated every ten year anniversary and/or on exit of the asset from the trust fund. 

Trustees are responsible for paying tax on income received by discretionary trusts.  The first Β£1,000 is taxed at the standard rate. 

If the settlor has more than one trust, this Β£1,000 is divided by the number of trusts they have.  However, if the settlor has set up five or more trusts, the standard rate band for each trust is Β£200. 

The tax rates are below:

Trust income up to Β£1,000

Type of incomeTax rate
Dividend type income7.5%
All other income20%

Trust income over Β£1,000

Type of incomeTax rate
Dividend type income38.1%
All other income45%

Trustees do not qualify for the dividend allowance.  This means trustees pay tax on all dividends depending on the tax band they fall within.

Interest in possession trusts/life interest trusts

The interest in possession trust is often referred to as a life interest trust or a fixed interest trust.  In its simplest form, the beneficiary (or life tenant) is entitled to the net income from the fund in which he has an interest (after the trustees have deducted expenses properly incurred by them in the exercise of their management powers) for the rest of his life or for a fixed period.

On the death of the life tenant, the right to trust income will pass to another if the trust document provides for this or will end with the distribution to the capital beneficiaries or become part of a discretionary trust. 

Interest in possession trusts created during the lifetime of the settlor before March 2006 were potentially exempt transfers.  Inheritance Tax was only chargeable if the settlor died within seven years of setting up the trust. 

The Finance Act 2006 made significant changes to the Inheritance Tax treatment of interest in possession trusts.  These changes took effect from 22 March 2006.  Since 22 March 2006, if an individual creates an interest in possession trust during his or her lifetime the transfer comes within the relevant property regime, and:

  1. The transfer is immediately chargeable to Inheritance Tax; the assets within the trust are β€˜relevant property’ and are therefore subject to exit and principal charges.  This was not the case for interest in possession trusts set up before March 2006. 
  2. To understand the Inheritance Tax treatment of interest in possession trusts, we need to be able to differentiate between β€˜relevant property’ and β€˜qualifying interests in possession’. 
  3. Where trust assets are held on β€˜qualifying interest in possession’, such assets are comprised in the estate of a beneficiary.  Therefore, where a beneficiary is a life tenant of a β€˜qualifying’ interest in possession trust, the trust assets form part of his death estate.  As β€˜qualifying interest in possession trusts’ are already within the scope of Inheritance Tax, property within a qualifying interest in possession trust is not subject to exit and principal charges.

Finance Act 2006 changed the rules such that not all life tenants of interest in possession trusts are now treated as having a β€˜qualifying interest in possession’. 

The term β€˜qualifying interest in possession’ is used to describe:

IHTA 1984, Section 59 (1);

  1. Assets in a trust for a disabled person;
  2. Assets in an interest in possession trust created on death; and
  3. Assets in a lifetime interest in possession trust created before 22 March 2006. 

IHTA 1984, Section 3A (1):

Assets settled on β€˜qualifying interest in possession’ trusts are treated as being part of the estate of the beneficiary with the interest in possession (the life tenant). 

IHTA 1984, Section 49 :

Because such assets are taxed in the beneficiaries’ death estate, β€˜qualifying interest in possession trusts’ are not subject to exit and principal charges.

If an individual dies with a qualifying interest in possession in a trust, the trust assets will form part of his death estate.  The executors must declare the value of a qualifying interest in possession on the death estate return   (form IHT400).  If the beneficiary only has an interest in part of the trust fund, the same proportion of the assets in the trust is deemed to form part of his estate. 

Assets held in the deceased’s own right – personal assets etc – make up his β€˜free-estate’.  We value the free-estate, deduct any liabilities and then add the value of a qualifying interest in possession to the assets in the free-estate.  This total amount will be charged to Inheritance Tax. 

Taxation

The trustees are responsible for paying income tax at the rates below.

Type of incomeTax rate
Dividend type income7.5%
All other income20%

The trustees are responsible for paying income tax at the rates above.

Sometimes the trustees mandate income to the beneficiary.  This means it goes to them directly instead of being passed through the trustees. If this happens, the beneficiary needs to include this on their self-assessment tax return and pay tax on it. 

Settlor interested trusts

This is where the settlor is also a beneficiary of the trust that they have set up.  In these circumstances the settlor is responsible for income tax on these trusts, even if some of the income is not paid out to them.  However, the income tax is paid by the trustees as they receive the income.

  1. The trustees pay income tax on the trust income by filling out a trust and estate tax return.
  2. They give the settlor a statement of all the income and the rates of tax charged on it.
  3. The settlor tells HMRC about the tax the trustees have paid on their behalf on a self-assessment tax return.  The rate of income tax depends on what type of trust the settlor interested trust is. 

On the death of the settlor the full value of the trust fund forms part of the settlor’s estate.

If you have any questions please call us on 020 7481 2422 or email us atΒ enquiries@wellerslawgroup.comΒ if you would like to know more.

This article was written by Wellers Law Group and the law is correct as at 24th November 2020. Please note that tax legislation changes frequently, so this article should not be relied upon without seeking further legal advice.

Why You Should Take Legal Advice When Making Your Will and LPA

Why You Should Seek Professional Legal Advice for Your Will

Your will is one of the most significant documents you will ever create. It sets out your wishes for your estate after you are gone. To ensure it is properly written and legally valid, it is crucial to use a professional solicitor. DIY wills are more prone to errors, which can render them invalid, potentially causing significant complications. A solicitor will ensure that your will is executed correctly, giving you peace of mind.
Professional assistance is essential in drafting your will no matter your circumstances but particularly if you own property in the U.K. or abroad, own a business, have dependents outside your immediate family or you’re aiming to reduce your inheritance tax bill or have complex wishes.

Who Should Make a Will?

Everyone over the age of 18 should make a will, particularly if you have a partner, children, property, shared financial assets, or any other significant assets. Making a will gives you control over your legacy. You can choose an executor you trust to carry out your wishes.
Without a will, your assets will be distributed according to the Rules of Intestacy. This means you cannot choose your executor; one will be appointed for you, who may not act in your best interests.

Keeping Your Will Up to Date

It is important to regularly review your will with a solicitor to ensure it reflects your current circumstances. Significant life events, such as marriage, remarriage, having children, a family member’s death, or changes in inheritance tax laws, necessitate updating your will. This ensures it remains effective and honours your intentions.

Understanding Inheritance Tax

Inheritance Tax (IHT) is payable on estates exceeding the Nil Rate Band allowanceβ€”the amount you can leave tax-free. While everyone is subject to the Nil Rate Band, in 2017, the Government introduced an additional Nil Rate Band, subject to conditions:

1. You must have a property to leave to your descendants (children or grandchildren).
2. Your estate must be valued at under Β£2 million.

By consulting with a solicitor, you can ensure that your will is valid, up-to-date, and optimised to manage inheritance tax effectively.

Find out more about why you need a professionally drafted Will, with Dawn Pearce

 

Why You Need to Create a Lasting Power of Attorney with a Legal Professional

Creating a Lasting Power of Attorney with a solicitor ensures that the document is correctly drafted and legally sound. Solicitors provide professional advice tailored to your specific situation, helping you understand the implications of your choices. They also ensure that the document meets all legal requirements, reducing the risk of errors that could render it invalid.

Additionally, a solicitor can help you navigate the complexities of LPAs, including advice on selecting appropriate attorneys and understanding their responsibilities. By creating an LPA with a solicitor, you can have peace of mind that your affairs will be managed according to your wishes, without unnecessary delays or complications.

What is an LPA?

A Lasting Power of Attorney (LPA) is a legally binding document that enables you to appoint someone to act on your behalf when you are no longer able to do so yourself.

There are various reasons you might need someone to act on your behalf. In the short term, this could be due to a hospital stay where you need someone to manage your bills. Over a longer period, it might be necessary if you are diagnosed with a condition like dementia and need someone to take over your property and financial affairs.

Types of Lasting Power of Attorney

There are two types of LPAs:

  1. Property and Financial Affairs: This allows you to appoint someone to manage your finances, property, claim, receive or use your benefits, and handle your bank accounts.
  2. Health and Welfare: This allows you to appoint someone to make decisions on your behalf regarding where you live and your medical care when you can no longer make these decisions yourself.

If you have an Enduring Power of Attorney (EPA) document, you will need to create an LPA to ensure your wishes are upheld. EPAs stopped being issued in 2007 and were replaced by LPAs.

If you lose capacity and only have an EPA, the document must be sent off for registration with the Office of the Public Guardian, which can result in a lengthy delay before any action can be taken, during which your assets are frozen. With an LPA, registration occurs at the time of creation, ensuring it is ready for use whenever needed.

 

Get In Touch With Our Team Today

Ensuring that your Lasting Power of Attorney and Will are properly drafted and legally sound is crucial for safeguarding your future and the future of your loved ones.

Our experienced solicitors are here to provide expert guidance and support, ensuring your legal documents are tailored to your unique needs.

Don’t leave such important matters to chance. Contact the Wellers Law Group team today to discuss how we can assist you in creating a Lasting Power of Attorney and drafting your Will.

 

Find out more about LPAs with Dawn Pearce

Intellectual Property Rights In The Music Industry: Trump vs O’Connor

Sinead O’Connor’s Estate has asked Donald Trump not to use her famous β€œNothing Compares 2 U” recording at his political rallies.

Trump has some form in using well known pop and rock songs at his political rallies which on occasion have riled the artists concerned.

 

So, what is the legal position?

We must distinguish between the position in the US and the UK and also look at what rights are involved.

Putting it simply there are two copyrights involved:

  1. The copyright in the songs themselves; and
  2. The copyright in the sound recordings embodying those songs.

 

Generally, in the US the relevant performing right societies, generally ASCAP and BMI, administer the public performance of songs (compositions).  These compositions are generally owned by music publishers rather than writers since the songwriters have assigned the rights in those composition to music publishers.  As music publishers want to monetise exploitation of those compositions as much as possible, even if they could (which is debatable) stop the performance of those compositions at political rallies, they will generally not do so unless the songwriter concerned has a contractual right to stop it or is a big enough name for them to care about.

In the case of performers who do not write their own songs, there is nothing they can do to stop this in relation to the composition itself.

In fact β€œNothing Compares 2 U” was written by Prince rather than Sinead O’Connor so any legal attempt to prevent its being played at Trump’s rallies would need to be by Prince’s estate or music publishers.

The position is similar in the UK where PRS is the only performing right society. Generally, they will be granting blanket licences for the public performance of all songs be they political rallies, football matches or restaurants and bars.

The position in relation to copyright in sound recordings is a different one.   Sound recordings are generally owned by artists’ record companies.  Although there may be a few examples where artists have retained or bought back their sound recordings generally it is the record companies who are in charge here. There is a major difference in the US and the UK. In the US generally the public performance of sound recordings has no copyright protection so that the record companies, even if they wanted to, could not stop their public performance at political rallies.

In the UK there are so called β€œneighbouring rights” which protect the public performance of sound recordings.  These are administered by Phonographic Performance Limited (PPL) and generally PPL will grant blanket licences. However, PPL’s public position is that they will not grant a licence for public performance of sound recordings at political rallies without the β€œrights holders’” consent.  This presumably means the record companies. Although, in the UK, the performing artists do receive royalties from the public performance of their recordings so perhaps PPL will take note of their sensibilities. If in fact PPL seek only the record companies’ consent then that will normally be forthcoming unless they have an artist objecting who has enough sway (generally where they are earning the record company millions of pounds and do not owe them millions of pounds!) to bring about the prevention of the public performance of the sound recordings concerned.

 

If you have an Intellectual Property enquiry, get in touch with Howard Ricklow to find out how he can help you:

Email: howard.ricklow@wellerslawgroup.com

Phone: 020 7481 6396

International Data Transfers – 21st March 2024 deadline approaches!

International transfers of personal data to a recipient outside of the UK may only take place if:

  1. the jurisdiction is deemed to have an adequate level of protection for data subjects’ personal data compared with that of the GDPR; or
  2. there are β€œappropriate safeguards” in place; or
  3. there are only occasional necessary transfers and a particular derogation my apply.

The countries deemed by the UK to have adequate data protection laws are few, including the European Economic Area (EEA) countries, Andorra, Argentina , Faroe Islands, Guernsey, the Isle of Man, Israel, Jersey, New Zealand, Switzerland and Uruguay.

If personal data is to be exported from the UK to any other country then generally the most common β€œappropriate safeguard” utilised is the approved Standard Contractual Clauses (β€œSCCs”). Pre-Brexit the EU approved SCCs applied to the UK as they did to every EU country. However, new forms of SCCs approved by the EU were adopted on 4th June 2021 (β€œNew SCCs”).

The UK’s answer to the New SCCs was and is the International Data Transfer Agreement (β€œIDTA”) which came into force on 21st March 2022.

As well as the IDTA, the UK adopted an addendum (β€œUK Addendum”) to the New SCCs which is convenient for businesses with data transfers subject to both EU and UK GDPR and/ or who may already have the New SCC’s in place.

Whilst many organisations have utilised the IDTA or the UK Addendum, some organisations have not and have legitimately continued to use the original SCCs. That option ends on 21st March 2024.

Accordingly, it will be a breach of UK GDPR/ Data Protection Act 2018 for organisations internationally transferring personal data relying on β€œappropriate safeguards” and utilising SCCs unless they do so utilising IDTA or the New SCCs and the UK Addendum.

You should contact us immediately if you need advice in this area to avoid the risk of incurring substantial fines.

Contact Howard Ricklow via email at howard.ricklow@wellerslawgroup.com or by phone on 020 7481 6396.

The Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023

These changes which are in effect from 4th March 2024 have been enacted to enhance the role of the Registrar of Companies and Companies House as a proactive regulator building on the changes introduced under the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2022.

 

The principal changes include:

  • Registered office – all companies must now have an “appropriate address” at all times. This means that companies will no longer be able to use a PO box as their registered address and the address must be one where an acknowledgement of receipt of delivery can be obtained

 

  • Email address – companies will need to provide a registered email address which will need to be monitored. This will be used for communications with Companies House and will not be publicly available

 

  • Lawful purpose – upon incorporation the subscribers of the company will need to confirm that they are forming for a lawful purpose and subsequently when filing the company’s annual confirmation statement there will need to be a statement that the company’s future activities are lawful

 

  • Company names – there are expanded restrictions on company names, including potential restrictions on names which could be used to facilitate dishonesty or deception

 

  • Annotations – Companies House will be able to annotate the Register where information appears misleading or incorrect

 

  • Companies House –may use data matching software to identify and remove inaccurate information from the Register

 

  • Powers of the Registrar – Companies House will have additional powers to scrutinise and reject company information which appears incorrect or inconsistent with existing filings

 

  • Data – the Registrar will have the power to share data with other governmental departments and law enforcement agencies.

 

UK companies will need to become aware of these important changes and ensure that they comply with the provisions since in some cases failure to do so could lead to criminal liability for the company and its officers.

Get in touch with Wellers Law Group to assist you with any changes which need to be made in terms of proper compliance.

 

This article was written by Howard Ricklow, our head of Company and Commercial law. To connect with Howard and to enquire about his services, please email howard.ricklow@wellerslawgroup.com or call him on Β 020 7481 6396.

 

Navigating Inheritance Tax Implications for Cohabitating Couples

In a rapidly evolving social landscape, cohabitation has become a prevalent lifestyle choice for many couples. However, when it comes to inheritance tax, cohabitating couples often find themselves in a challenging situation when it comes to writing their wills and making them tax efficient.

Inheritance tax laws are typically structured to provide certain benefits and exemptions for legally married or civilly partnered couples. Unfortunately, cohabitating couples may not automatically enjoy the same rights and protections. As a result, the passing of assets from one partner to another in the event of death can trigger tax liabilities that may not be evident in traditional marital arrangements.

In many jurisdictions, married couples benefit from generous estate tax exemptions and the ability to transfer assets to a surviving spouse without incurring inheritance tax. Cohabitating couples, however, may face a different reality. Upon the death of one partner, the surviving partner could be subject to inheritance tax on assets that exceed the prevailing tax-free threshold (currently Β£325,000).

While cohabitating couples may face additional challenges, they are not without recourse. Strategic estate planning can play a pivotal role in mitigating tax liability and ensuring that a partner’s legacy is preserved.

Crafting a comprehensive and legally sound will is of paramount importance for cohabitating couples. A well-drafted will can outline the distribution of assets and provide clarity on the intentions of the deceased partner. Additionally, cohabitants should explore the inclusion of specific provisions to minimize tax exposure and enable the surviving partner to inherit without undue financial burden.

Cohabitating couples may consider strategic lifetime gifting as a means of transferring assets while minimising tax implications. By gifting assets during their lifetime, partners can potentially reduce the taxable value of their estate, thereby decreasing the inheritance tax liability for the surviving partner.

Understanding the nuances of inheritance tax is crucial for preserving financial legacies and safeguarding the interests of both partners. Cohabitating couples can take proactive steps, such as strategic estate planning, crafting comprehensive wills, and seeking professional advice in relation to cohabitation agreements, to navigate the challenges posed by inheritance tax. By doing so, they can ensure that their intentions are realised, their financial well-being is protected, and their loved ones inherit their assets as they intended in most tax-efficient way possible.

This article was prepared by Naomi Augustine-Walker, a private client solicitor in our London office. You can contact Naomi by email: Naomi.Augustine-Walker@wellerslawgroup.com or by telephone: 020 3831 2669 For our Bromley office please call 020 8464 4242 and for Surrey the number is 01372 750100.

The Difference Between Chargeable Lifetime Transfers (CLT) and Potentially Exempt Transfers (PETs)

When planning to reduce your inheritance tax bill, understanding the difference between potentially exempt transfers (PETs) and chargeable lifetime transfers (CLTs) is essential. Making the right choice could save your family thousands in tax.

The easiest way to reduce your estate is to spend it! This can be done either by enjoying the money yourself during your lifetime or gifting it to friends, relatives or charities. But not all gifts are treated equally for tax purposes.

What is a potentially exempt transfer?

A potentially exempt transfer (PET) is a gift you make during your lifetime that could become completely free from inheritance tax. The key word is “potentially” – these gifts start as potentially taxable but become exempt if you survive for seven years after making them.

Potentially exempt transfer examples include:

  • Gifts of money to children or grandchildren
  • Transferring property to family members
  • Giving away valuable possessions or investments
  • Setting money aside for a loved one’s future

These gifts aren’t immediately taxable, which makes them an attractive option for inheritance tax planning.

What are chargeable lifetime transfers?

Chargeable lifetime transfers are immediately chargeable to inheritance tax. Such transfers commonly involve payments into a trust which will incur a 20% tax charge on anything over the gift-giver’s nil-rate band (currently Β£325,000).

Chargeable lifetime transfers examples include:

  • Gifts into discretionary trusts
  • Transfers to certain types of trust for disabled beneficiaries
  • Gifts to companies
  • Some transfers involving overseas trusts

Chargeable lifetime transfer vs PET – key differences

The main differences between PETs and CLTs are:

Immediate tax:

  • PETs: No immediate tax to pay
  • CLTs: 20% tax on amounts over Β£325,000

After seven years:

  • PETs: Become completely tax-free
  • CLTs: Original 20% charge stands, but no additional tax

If you die within seven years:

  • PETs: May become chargeable at up to 40%
  • CLTs: May face additional tax up to 40% (less the 20% already paid)

Potentially exempt transfer 7 year rule

The potentially exempt transfer rules centre on a crucial seven-year period. If you survive for seven years after making a PET, the gift becomes completely exempt from inheritance tax and no longer counts against your nil-rate band.

How the 7 year rule works:

  • Years 0-3: Full 40% tax if you die (on amounts over Β£325,000)
  • Year 3-4: 32% tax (20% taper relief)
  • Year 4-5: 24% tax (40% taper relief)
  • Year 5-6: 16% tax (60% taper relief)
  • Year 6-7: 8% tax (80% taper relief)
  • After 7 years: No tax at all

Potentially exempt transfer taper relief

Potentially exempt transfer taper relief reduces the inheritance tax rate on PETs if you die between three and seven years after making the gift. This relief only applies to the tax on the gift itself, not to the overall estate.

Important points about taper relief:

  • Only applies after three years
  • Reduces the tax rate, not the value of the gift
  • Only benefits gifts that exceed the nil-rate band
  • The gift still uses up nil-rate band for seven years

Who pays tax on potentially exempt transfers?

If inheritance tax becomes due on a potentially exempt transfer, the recipient of the gift is primarily responsible for paying the tax. However, if they cannot pay, the estate becomes liable. This is why it’s important to:

  • Keep records of all substantial gifts
  • Consider whether recipients could afford potential tax
  • Think about life insurance to cover potential tax liabilities

Do I have to declare a potentially exempt transfer?

You don’t need to declare potentially exempt transfers to HMRC when you make them. However, you should:

  • Keep accurate records of all gifts
  • Note the date and value of each transfer
  • Record who received the gift
  • Save documentation for seven years

Your executors will need this information if you die within seven years of making the gift.

Inheritance tax and potentially exempt transfers – exemptions and allowances

Gifts to charities and spouses are exempt from inheritance tax. You can gift as much as you like during your lifetime to these recipients and there will be no inheritance tax payable.

Annual exemptions that don’t count as PETs

Beyond these special exemptions, everyone has annual allowances that are immediately free from inheritance tax – they don’t even count as PETs:

Β£3,000 annual exemption:  You can give away Β£3,000 each tax year without any inheritance tax implications. If you don’t use it all, you can carry forward the unused amount for one year only.

Β£250 small gifts You can give as many Β£250 gifts as you like to different people each year. However, you can’t combine this with your annual exemption – so you couldn’t give someone Β£3,250 using both allowances.

Wedding and civil partnership gifts

  • To your children: Β£5,000
  • To your grandchildren: Β£2,500
  • To anyone else: Β£1,000

Why these exemptions matter:  These gifts are immediately exempt – they don’t use up your nil-rate band and won’t be subject to inheritance tax even if you die within seven years. Couples can each use their own allowances, effectively doubling these amounts when giving jointly.

Potentially exempt transfer limit

There’s no upper limit on potentially exempt transfers, but practical considerations apply:

  • Gifts over Β£325,000 risk inheritance tax if you die within seven years
  • You must retain enough to maintain your standard of living
  • Very large gifts might be challenged if you continue to benefit

Unused annual allowances: You can carry forward one year’s unused annual exemption. For example, if you didn’t make any gifts last year, you could give Β£6,000 this year. Couples could potentially give Β£12,000 if both have unused allowances.

Regular gifts from surplus income

Regular gifts from surplus income are completely exempt from inheritance tax – they don’t even count as PETs. To qualify:

  • Gifts must be from income, not capital
  • They must be regular (monthly, annually, etc.)
  • You must maintain your normal standard of living
  • Keep records proving the gifts are from surplus income

This exemption has no monetary limit, making it valuable for those with significant surplus income.

Chargeable lifetime transfer after 7 years

Unlike PETs, chargeable lifetime transfers don’t become exempt after seven years. The initial 20% tax always stands. However, if you survive seven years:

  • No additional inheritance tax is due on death
  • The CLT no longer affects your nil-rate band
  • The trust continues under its original terms

This certainty can make CLTs attractive despite the upfront tax cost.

Potentially exempt transfers and chargeable lifetime transfers – making the choice

Choosing between PETs and CLTs depends on your circumstances:

Consider PETs when:

  • You’re confident of surviving seven years
  • You want to make outright gifts
  • You prefer to avoid immediate tax
  • The recipients are responsible adults

Consider CLTs when:

  • You need to retain some control via trustees
  • Beneficiaries need protection
  • You’re planning for multiple generations
  • The immediate 20% tax is acceptable

Get expert advice on lifetime transfers

Understanding potentially exempt transfers and chargeable lifetime transfers is complex but getting it right could save significant inheritance tax. Our experienced private client team can help you choose the most appropriate strategy for your circumstances.

We can advise on:

  • Whether PETs or CLTs suit your situation
  • Maximising available exemptions and reliefs
  • Record-keeping requirements
  • Life insurance to cover potential tax
  • Trust arrangements for CLTs

To learn more about how PETs and CLTs affect you, get in touch with Annelise Tyler by email annelise.tyler@wellerslawgroup.com or by phone 01732 446374 today.

This is Why You Should Never Make a Will Without Taking Legal Advice

Making a will without the benefit of professional legal advice is an excellent recipe for strife between your loved ones after you are gone. That was sadly so in the case of a cancer sufferer who had no understanding that, when she signed her will, she was disinheriting her two beloved children.

About two and a half years before she succumbed to the disease, the middle-aged woman signed a will which had been drafted for her by her younger brother using a template downloaded from the internet. Save for her collection of books, she bequeathed him the entirety of her estate, which was worth almost Β£400,000. The will represented a radical departure from a previous will by which she had divided her estate equally between her children.

After the children challenged the will’s validity, the brother contended that it was a perfectly straightforward case in which she had simply changed her mind for good reasons, as she was fully entitled to do. He had faithfully carried out his sister’s instructions in drafting a very clear and straightforward will, the terms of which she could not have failed to understand.

There was no dispute that the will was lawfully executed and that she had the mental capacity required to make it. However, in upholding her children’s challenge, the High Court found that, having taken no legal advice, the woman fundamentally misunderstood what the effect of the document would be.

Her intention was that her brother, acting as her executor, would receive her estate and then apportion it between the children so as to reflect a disparity in lifetime gifts they had received from her. She failed to grasp that the effect of the document was to disinherit the children and give the entirety of her estate, bar her books, to her brother to keep for his own purposes.

The Court had no doubt that she deeply loved her children, who, despite their faults and foibles, were her pride and joy. She was grateful for her brother’s support as she fought tooth and nail against her illness, but he had not replaced her children in her affections. Even after she signed the will, she continued to make reference to the children’s upcoming inheritance.

The Court observed that there were aspects of the document, and the background history leading up to its execution, that excited suspicion. It found on the evidence that she lacked knowledge and approval of the will’s contents and particularly its effect. In restoring the children’s equal inheritance, the Court directed that the previous will should be admitted to probate.

Parking Fine Imposed on Private Landowner Triggers High Court Test Case

A fine imposed on a householder for parking her Land Rover on her own land put the conflict between private ownership and public access to the road network in high relief and provided the subject matter for an important High Court test case.

For many years the householder had regularly parked her car on a strip of pavement outside her home. The strip, which she and her husband owned, lay between their front hedge and the road. She was incensed when a local authority parking warden put a ticket on her windscreen, but her appeal was rejected by a parking adjudicator. The penalty was also confirmed by another adjudicator on review.

In upholding her challenge to that outcome, the Court rejected the local authority’s argument that the strip was deemed to have been dedicated as a public highway because members of the public had enjoyed access to it, as of right and without interruption, for 20 years or more. The reviewing adjudicator had made an error of law in concluding that such public access was not interrupted by the frequent presence of the couple’s parked cars on the strip.

The Court found that the strip could also not be viewed as a road to which the public has access, within the meaning of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1967. During each of the 13 years in which the couple had owned their home, they had parked cars on the strip about 200 times, thus regularly impeding public access.

Had it been necessary to do so, the Court noted that it would have found that any implied licence that members of the public had to access the strip had been inoperable on the day the ticket was issued, due to the presence of the Land Rover. The local authority was directed to cancel the parking ticket.

SDLT on Mixed Use Property

With Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) charged differently on residential and non-residential property, the disposal of a mixed-use property can lead to tax consequences that may affect the value you receive on sale.

Recently, the Chartered Institute of Taxation and the Stamp Taxes Practitioners Group agreed new guidance with HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) on the classification of property in some common cases where there is mixed use of the premises.

HMRC have decided that the prior guidance that if the property is marketed as residential, it will be a residential property for SDLT purposes should not apply. Instead the test will be if the property is used or suitable for use as a residential property at the date of sale.

If a building is demolished or derelict, it will not be regarded as being ‘in use or suitable for use as a dwelling’, and where such a building is being reconstructed, the position will be decided on the facts: the work has to be significant – there is no ‘golden brick’ rule.

Lastly, where there is a mixed residential/non-residential use, the SDLT status of the property will depend on the facts – a ‘home office’ will be residential, but a self-contained business office (e.g. a surgery) or area let separately is likely to be classified as commercial. The test here is whether an identifiable use of an area precludes use of that area for any other purpose.

Always take professional advice before putting a property on the market.

Β 

If you would like to receive our newsletter please let us know here